In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 50 by 134 minutes, completing the 1763km route in 17h 48min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 48min (134 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 8min
- Energy: ~324 kWh
- Distance: 1763km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron 50 |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
20h 2min |
17h 48min |
| Charging time: |
3h 22min |
1h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron 50 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 49% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Uniwar P1 (13 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Signalbau (16 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's (18 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Electra Pizza Plus (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Ledra Ovest (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 12:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 13:
Ristorante Goyo (20 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 14:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (19 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (10 min, 43% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Olympia (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Electra Pizza Plus (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 134-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 50 on this 1763km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 8min vs 3h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~324 kWh vs ~426 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons