In our Zagreb to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 47 minutes, completing the 1655km route in 16h 55min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 55min (47 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~270 kWh
- Distance: 1655km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
16h 55min |
17h 42min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (10 min, 14% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Nentershausen Ost (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Prins van Oranje (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: London
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 17% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
OBI Markt (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 6:
JBC (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Eurotunnel Flexiplus Lounge (14 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 47-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1655km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~270 kWh vs ~288 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons