In our Zagreb to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 34 minutes, completing the 1386km route in 13h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 42min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~226 kWh
- Distance: 1386km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
13h 42min |
14h 16min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~249 kWh |
~249 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Samerberg Nord (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Adolf-Seebacher-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pendlerparkplatz Schweinbach (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Stadtbäcker Scharold (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark A8 (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Keskastel Est (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (17 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 1386km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~226 kWh vs ~241 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons