In our Zagreb to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 2008km route in 22h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 57min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~313 kWh
- Distance: 2008km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 57min |
23h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~361 kWh |
~362 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Donautal Ost (14 min, 19% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Tankstelle Bergler (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (14 min, 15% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2008km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 1h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~313 kWh vs ~369 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons