In our Zagreb to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 66 minutes, completing the 2013km route in 23h 11min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 11min (66 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~370 kWh
- Distance: 2013km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 17min |
23h 11min |
| Charging time: |
2h 23min |
1h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~362 kWh |
~362 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Turmöl Tankstelle (14 min, 20% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Bergler Autohof Neuhaus (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Autohof (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger SB Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King (11 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Barbecue barn (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 12% → 52%)
-
Stop 12:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 15% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Tankstelle Bergler (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 3:
Burger King Autohof Bitterfeld (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 12% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Burger King (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (14 min, 15% → 70%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 66-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2013km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~370 kWh vs ~373 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons