In our Zagreb to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 31 minutes, completing the 1680km route in 18h 12min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 12min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~261 kWh
- Distance: 1680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
18h 12min |
18h 43min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~302 kWh |
~303 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße West (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 1h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~261 kWh vs ~308 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons