In our Amsterdam to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 206 minutes, completing the 2088km route in 26h 34min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 34min (206 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~325 kWh
- Distance: 2088km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
26h 34min |
30h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
3h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~376 kWh |
~382 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Total Autohof (18 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Auchan (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Olsze Północ (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
VS Express (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Neste (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
PENNY (27 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Subway Lübecker Straße (26 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Elektro Jahn (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Rossmann Graniczna (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Żwirki i Wigury (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
Lidl (36 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Girelė (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Circle K Purvciems (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 10:
Rannahotell (23 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 11:
Alexela Saku (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 206-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2088km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 3h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~325 kWh vs ~332 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons