In our Amsterdam to Lisbon EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 2216km route in 22h 43min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 43min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 19min
- Energy: ~362 kWh
- Distance: 2216km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 43min |
23h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 19min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~399 kWh |
~399 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bauer Paris Occasion (10 min, 13% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Tours La Longue Vue (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire des Groies (13 min, 21% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Area El Canto (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Castelo Branco Oeste (10 min, 21% → 62%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Léger (10 min, 29% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY McDonald's (17 min, 11% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire des Groies (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Océan Ouest (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Repsol Lopidana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Area El Canto (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Cepsa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Castelo Branco Oeste (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Lisbon
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2216km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 19min vs 1h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~362 kWh vs ~407 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons