In our Amsterdam to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 100 minutes, completing the 1746km route in 17h 57min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 57min (100 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1746km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 57min |
19h 37min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~314 kWh |
~315 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Novotel Roissy Saint-Witz (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Limours-Janvry (11 min, 48% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Aire des Groies (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de l'Océan Ouest (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Briviesca Norte (11 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Novotel Lille Aéroport (18 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Bauer Paris Occasion (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Aire des Groies (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de l'Océan Ouest (24 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 8:
Repsol Lopidana (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Área de Servicio Milagros (13 min, 14% → 56%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 100-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1746km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~275 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons