In our Madrid to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 98 minutes, completing the 1747km route in 17h 59min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 59min (98 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1747km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
17h 59min |
19h 37min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~314 kWh |
~315 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Est (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger N10 (14 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Aire de Val Neuvy (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Vichtesteenweg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (12 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire Fontbelleau Bayonne Paris (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger N10 (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY McDonald's (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Ressons Est (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Hazeldonk-Oost (10 min, 11% → 45%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 98-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1747km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 2h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~275 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons