In our Athens to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 145 minutes, completing the 2143km route in 23h 54min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 54min (145 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 26min
- Energy: ~334 kWh
- Distance: 2143km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
23h 54min |
26h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 26min |
3h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~386 kWh |
~389 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (10 min, 29% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (28 min, 11% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Zemun Park (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (11 min, 32% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Athens (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (15 min, 36% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Thessaloniki (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (26 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Ledi MS (39 min, 21% → 89%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland Wolkera (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 11:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 12:
Shell MOP East (20 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 145-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2143km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 26min vs 3h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~334 kWh vs ~341 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons