In our Barcelona to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 1860km route in 17h 52min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 52min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1860km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 52min |
18h 3min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~335 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Tricastin (14 min, 14% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire du Jura (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Park & Ride Pendlerparkplatz (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Frankenhöhe Süd (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Barcelona (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire d'Estézargues Sud (11 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Aire de Lyon-Dagneux (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rue Monge (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Porte d'Alsace Sud (10 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
ATU (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1860km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~341 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons