In our Belgrade to Athens EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 26 minutes, completing the 1097km route in 12h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 19min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~173 kWh
- Distance: 1097km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 45min |
12h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
1h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~197 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (18 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (21 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (18 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Skotina dir Athen (29 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Atalanti Süd (14 min, 17% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (12 min, 31% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell (23 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 26-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1097km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~173 kWh vs ~186 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons