In our Belgrade to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 80 minutes, completing the 1275km route in 13h 28min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 28min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~198 kWh
- Distance: 1275km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 28min |
14h 48min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~230 kWh |
~230 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 21% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 16% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Novate Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 39% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Petrol (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Fratta Nord (22 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Galbusera Tre Marie (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 80-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1275km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~198 kWh vs ~201 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons