In our Bern to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 66 minutes, completing the 1292km route in 13h 29min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 29min (66 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~201 kWh
- Distance: 1292km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 29min |
14h 35min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
1h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~233 kWh |
~233 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (11 min, 32% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 3:
Petrol (13 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lambro Sud (10 min, 15% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Limenella Sud (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 6:
Petrol (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger (21 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 66-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1292km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 1h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~201 kWh vs ~204 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons