In our Belgrade to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 2532km route in 25h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 49min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~413 kWh
- Distance: 2532km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 49min |
26h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
1h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~456 kWh |
~456 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Brescia Est (13 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Rinovo Nord (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Lançon de Provence Est (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 11% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 13% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Grič - Čatež (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Brescia Est (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (15 min, 11% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 28% → 74%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 9:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2532km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 1h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~413 kWh vs ~465 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons