In our Belgrade to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 116 minutes, completing the 1713km route in 20h 11min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 11min (116 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~267 kWh
- Distance: 1713km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 11min |
22h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
2h 41min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Tesco (12 min, 27% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Belgrade (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesco (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland Wolkera (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
KFC (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 116-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1713km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 2h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~267 kWh vs ~272 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons