In our Riga to Belgrade EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 125 minutes, completing the 1710km route in 20h 13min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 13min (125 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1710km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 13min |
22h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
2h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 47% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (19 min, 18% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (14 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Połomskiego (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Wolkera (23 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (20 min, 16% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Backa Topola jug (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Belgrade
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 125-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1710km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 2h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~272 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons