In our Berlin to Madrid EV duel, the Citroën ë-C4 beats the Citroën ë-Berlingo by 19 minutes, completing the 2321km route in 27h 1min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 21, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Citroën ë-C4 needs only 21 charging stops compared to 23 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Citroën ë-C4
- Total time: 27h 1min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 21
- Charging time: 5h 2min
- Energy: ~395 kWh
- Distance: 2321km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Citroën ë-Berlingo |
Citroën ë-C4 |
| Travel time |
27h 20min |
27h 1min |
| Charging time: |
5h 15min |
5h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
23 |
21 |
| Energy used |
~418 kWh |
~417 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Citroën ë-Berlingo Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord, Königslutter am Elm (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 2:
HEM Tankstelle Lahe, Hannover (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg, Porta Westfalica (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Ehrenberg West, Wuppertal (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle, Düren (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord, Soumagne (19 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Q8 Le Rœulx Nord, Le Roeulx (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (11 min, 18% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 11:
Bauer Paris Occasion, Saint-Witz (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Aire des Plaines de Beauce, Châtenay (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 13:
Warsemann Automobiles, Blois (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 14:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine, Saint-Épain (25 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 15:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 16:
IONITY Aire de Bédenac Ouest, Bedenac (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 17:
Supercharger Centre commercial Rives d'Arcins, Bègles (18 min, 20% → 67%)
-
Stop 18:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 19:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest, Labenne (10 min, 22% → 52%)
-
Stop 20:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea, Zestoa (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 21:
Repsol Lopidana, Vitoria-Gasteiz (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 22:
Supercharger Calle Herreros, Villagonzalo Pedernales (23 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 23:
Gasolinera Mirasierra, Santo Tomé del Puerto (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Citroën ë-C4 Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's, Peine (14 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg, Porta Westfalica (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus Weber, Beckum (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Ehrenberg West, Wuppertal (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle, Düren (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord, Soumagne (18 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Le Rœulx Nord, Le Rœulx (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest, La Sentinelle (10 min, 17% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Syrest, Roye (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
Bauer Paris Occasion, Saint-Witz (18 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Aire des Plaines de Beauce, Châtenay (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 12:
Warsemann Automobiles, Blois (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 13:
Aire de Ste Maure de Touraine, Saint-Épain (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 14:
Supercharger N10, Ruffec (27 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 15:
Aire Fontbelleau Paris Bayonne, Lormont (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 16:
Supercharger McDonald's, Castets (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 17:
IONITY Aire de Labenne Ouest, Labenne (10 min, 20% → 44%)
-
Stop 18:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea, Zestoa (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 19:
Repsol Lopidana, Vitoria-Gasteiz (17 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 20:
Supercharger Calle Herreros, Villagonzalo Pedernales (21 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 21:
Gasolinera Mirasierra, Santo Tomé del Puerto (14 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Citroën ë-C4 Won
The Citroën ë-C4 achieved a 19-minute advantage over Citroën ë-Berlingo on this 2321km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 21 stops vs 23 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 5h 2min vs 5h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~395 kWh vs ~468 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons