In our Bern to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 30 minutes, completing the 2371km route in 25h 34min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 34min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 57min
- Energy: ~387 kWh
- Distance: 2371km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
25h 34min |
26h 4min |
| Charging time: |
1h 57min |
2h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~427 kWh |
~426 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Valtrompia Sud (10 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol A1 (26 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
IKEA (17 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Monte Alto Sud (10 min, 18% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 30-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2371km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 57min vs 2h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~387 kWh vs ~435 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons