In our Bern to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 57 minutes, completing the 923km route in 10h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 38min (57 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~144 kWh
- Distance: 923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 38min |
11h 35min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~166 kWh |
~167 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 12% → 49%)
- Arrival: London
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Lidl (10 min, 64% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Lotissement de L’Autoroute (18 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Champ Roland (20 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Channel Gateway (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 57-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 1h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~144 kWh vs ~147 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons