In our Bern to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 93 minutes, completing the 1469km route in 15h 14min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 14min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~229 kWh
- Distance: 1469km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 14min |
16h 47min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
2h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire d'Estézargues Nord (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Gasparets (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 15% → 58%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aire de Drumettaz (13 min, 30% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de La Coucourde (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Nabrigas (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Gasparets (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
ibis Styles Figueres Ronda (26 min, 11% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Ariza Norte (22 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 93-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1469km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 2h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~229 kWh vs ~234 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons