In our Bern to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 122 minutes, completing the 1891km route in 19h 48min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 16, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 48min (122 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1891km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 48min |
21h 50min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Franz-Marc-Straße (14 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Fachmarktzentrum Franz-Schubert-Straße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (12 min, 14% → 64%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Aichstetten (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Innpark (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Ansfelden Süd (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Weierbachweg (11 min, 13% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bábolna (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (24 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 9:
Spatiu Servicii A1 Pecica Sens Arad (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (Truck) (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 12:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 122-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1891km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~301 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons