In our Bern to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 26 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 6min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 28, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 6min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
22h 6min |
22h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~352 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 26-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~358 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons