In our Bern to Stockholm EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1823km route in 19h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 38min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~298 kWh
- Distance: 1823km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 38min |
19h 48min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 8min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~328 kWh |
~329 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Reinhardshain Süd (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Großburgwedel (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Lyngby Storcenter (12 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Motell Vätterleden (14 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Stockholm
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Burger King (11 min, 23% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Mer Rosi's Autohof (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Leonardo Hotel Hamburg-Stillhorn (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K Ljungby Nyponvägen Trucks (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Stockholm
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1823km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 8min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~298 kWh vs ~335 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons