In our Bern to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 28 minutes, completing the 2258km route in 26h 25min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 26h 25min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 34min
- Energy: ~368 kWh
- Distance: 2258km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
26h 25min |
26h 53min |
| Charging time: |
1h 34min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~406 kWh |
~407 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Autohof Herrieden (13 min, 20% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Total Autohof Leipzig Flughafen (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Rogoziniec (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bern (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 19% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Rogoziniec (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
Circle K (27 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 7:
Girelė (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 28-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2258km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 34min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~368 kWh vs ~415 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons