In our Bratislava to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 10 minutes, completing the 1649km route in 19h 50min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 50min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~269 kWh
- Distance: 1649km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 50min |
20h 0min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~297 kWh |
~297 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Redoil (10 min, 27% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
A.T.U (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 15% → 63%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bageterie Boulevard (11 min, 46% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Farø (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1649km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~269 kWh vs ~303 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons