In our Bratislava to Paris EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 23 minutes, completing the 1309km route in 13h 44min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 44min (23 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 44min
- Energy: ~208 kWh
- Distance: 1309km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 7min |
13h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 59min |
1h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~236 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
City Outlet Wels-Nord (10 min, 15% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger AVIA (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 14% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
ATU (10 min, 15% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (21 min, 11% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Gueux (15 min, 15% → 54%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Nürnberger Straße 25 (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
BFS Business Fleet Services (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Dannstadt Ost (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (25 min, 10% → 75%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 23-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1309km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 44min vs 1h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~208 kWh vs ~222 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons