In our Bratislava to Vilnius EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 43 minutes, completing the 1123km route in 12h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 52min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~177 kWh
- Distance: 1123km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 35min |
12h 52min |
| Charging time: |
2h 1min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~202 kWh |
~203 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 11% → 41%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (18 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (36 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (34 min, 10% → 80%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bratislava (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 16% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (12 min, 21% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (32 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (27 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 43-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1123km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 2h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~177 kWh vs ~190 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons