In our Vilnius to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 28 minutes, completing the 1130km route in 12h 48min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 48min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~178 kWh
- Distance: 1130km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
13h 16min |
12h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
1h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~203 kWh |
~204 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 26% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (17 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Signalbau (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Smaltovňa Mišík (10 min, 11% → 41%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 30% → 92%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Signalbau (17 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 28-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1130km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 1h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~178 kWh vs ~191 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons