In our Brussels to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 31 minutes, completing the 2192km route in 27h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 27h 27min (31 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~358 kWh
- Distance: 2192km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 27min |
27h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~395 kWh |
~394 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SB Tank Langer (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Genshagen (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Auchan (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (29 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW Schnellladepark (18 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Auchan (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Gajewo Wschód (25 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K (23 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 6:
VS Express (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (14 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 31-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2192km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~358 kWh vs ~402 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons