In our Brussels to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 79 minutes, completing the 1467km route in 16h 32min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 32min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~228 kWh
- Distance: 1467km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 32min |
17h 51min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~265 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
KFC (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
A2 Bottrop Süd (10 min, 28% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Ahrensfeld Ost (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Europaallee (11 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1467km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~228 kWh vs ~233 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons