In our Oslo to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 77 minutes, completing the 1465km route in 16h 31min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 31min (77 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~228 kWh
- Distance: 1465km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 31min |
17h 48min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~264 kWh |
~266 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Selgros Öjendorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Daisy's Diner (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Telekom Bahnhofstraße (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Carpool Maasmechelen (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 77-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1465km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~228 kWh vs ~233 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons