In our Oslo to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 101 minutes, completing the 1769km route in 19h 28min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 28min (101 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~275 kWh
- Distance: 1769km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
19h 28min |
21h 9min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~319 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rewe (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Groß Mackenstedt (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
HPC Lippestraße (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Selgros Öjendorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Daisy's Diner (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
SWD Ladepark Fährstraße (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Tignée Nord (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (23 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 101-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1769km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~275 kWh vs ~281 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons