In our Oslo to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 102 minutes, completing the 1802km route in 20h 32min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 32min (102 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~280 kWh
- Distance: 1802km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 32min |
22h 14min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
2h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~324 kWh |
~325 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned De Beerze (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (10 min, 33% → 69%)
- Arrival: London
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (10 min, 11% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Väla Centrum (17 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
bft Willer (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Selgros Öjendorf (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Daisy's Diner (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Telekom Bahnhofstraße (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 10:
BP De Beerze (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 11:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Eurotunnel (18 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 102-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1802km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~280 kWh vs ~287 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons