In our London to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 98 minutes, completing the 1803km route in 20h 36min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 36min (98 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~281 kWh
- Distance: 1803km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 36min |
22h 14min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~325 kWh |
~325 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Het Goor (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle Autohof Osnabrück-Hafen (10 min, 17% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
AVIA Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Uno-X Danmark (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Diksmuidestraat (10 min, 22% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Gentbrugge Zuid (10 min, 29% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Meelakkers (10 min, 13% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
A2 Bottrop Süd (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Teutopark (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Europaallee (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Barbecue barn (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
Supercharger Importgatan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 13:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 98-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1803km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~281 kWh vs ~287 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons