In our London to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 59 minutes, completing the 1099km route in 11h 30min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 30min (59 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 23min
- Energy: ~171 kWh
- Distance: 1099km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 30min |
12h 29min |
| Charging time: |
23min |
1h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~198 kWh |
~199 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle, Straelen (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Wiesenau, Langenhagen (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: London (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Oostendse Baan, Gistel (14 min, 20% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Oud-Turnhout Zuid, Oud-Turnhout (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle, Neukirchen-Vluyn (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Euro Rastpark, Lippetal (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd, Porta Westfalica (11 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Hansestraße, Braunschweig (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Euro Rastpark Theeßen, Möckern (11 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 59-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1099km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 23min vs 1h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~171 kWh vs ~175 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons