In our Brussels to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 151 minutes, completing the 1795km route in 20h 3min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 3min (151 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 4min
- Energy: ~279 kWh
- Distance: 1795km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 3min |
22h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 4min |
2h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~323 kWh |
~330 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Auchan (10 min, 15% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Olsze Północ (24 min, 12% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
VS Express (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Brussels (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Dehner Garten-Center (22 min, 12% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
PENNY Ahlten (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
REWE Conrad-Tack-Ring (22 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Avia Wojska Polskiego (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
N-Park (25 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Kwiatowa (35 min, 10% → 94%)
-
Stop 7:
Vilniaus (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Girelė (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 151-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1795km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 4min vs 2h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~279 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons