In our Bucharest to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 14 minutes, completing the 1889km route in 19h 54min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 21, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 54min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 1min
- Energy: ~308 kWh
- Distance: 1889km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 54min |
20h 8min |
| Charging time: |
1h 1min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~339 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV (11 min, 17% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 12% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului dreapta (10 min, 36% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV DN69 (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV eMotion Parndorf Outlet Center (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Raststation Strengberg (10 min, 15% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Burger King (11 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Migrol (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1889km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 1min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~308 kWh vs ~347 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons