In our Bucharest to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 114 minutes, completing the 2109km route in 30h 32min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 32min (114 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2109km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
30h 32min |
32h 26min |
| Charging time: |
2h 6min |
3h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~380 kWh |
~388 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Auto Mitric (10 min, 20% → 33%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (39 min, 18% → 74%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Łaszczowiecka (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Główna (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (11 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (13 min, 20% → 71%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Scorpion Exim (10 min, 38% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland Obor (25 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
LuxWash & LuxMarket (30 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
King Cross Leopolis (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Legionów (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Amic Unii Lubelskiej (16 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Park Handlowy Korkowa (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (11 min, 22% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Biedronka (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
Circle K Purvciems (18 min, 13% → 65%)
-
Stop 13:
Rimi Niidu (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 114-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2109km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 3h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~335 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons