In our Tallinn to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 178 minutes, completing the 2114km route in 29h 54min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 54min (178 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2114km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
29h 54min |
32h 52min |
| Charging time: |
2h 6min |
3h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
14 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~419 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (28 min, 22% → 83%)
-
Stop 3:
Biedronka Pogodna (10 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 4:
Revia Park (27 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (22 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Sucedava (29 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Lucavsala (33 min, 35% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
Würth (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Jono Dailidės (10 min, 22% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Sikorskiego (19 min, 14% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen Aleja Kraśnicka (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Biedronka Witolda (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 9:
ZSE Motor-Car MB (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Auchan (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger Oradea Shopping City (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 12:
Funshop Park (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 13:
Supercharger Prima Shopping Center (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 14:
Euro Tehno Group (14 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 178-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 2114km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 3h 52min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~336 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons