In our Budapest to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 101 minutes, completing the 1359km route in 16h 28min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 28min (101 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~211 kWh
- Distance: 1359km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 28min |
18h 9min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
2h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~245 kWh |
~244 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xland (10 min, 36% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Motorr (10 min, 30% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Lidl (10 min, 14% → 33%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Aleja Prymasa Tysiąclecia (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Rudniki Południe (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 101-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1359km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 2h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~211 kWh vs ~216 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons