In our Budapest to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 111 minutes, completing the 1665km route in 20h 52min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 52min (111 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 59min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1665km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
20h 52min |
22h 43min |
| Charging time: |
59min |
2h 34min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Xland (10 min, 36% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (19 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Budapest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kaufland Československej armády (10 min, 31% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Amic (15 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Orlen MOP Żabia Wola (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (28 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Norfa XL (10 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 24% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 11:
Rimi Niidu (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 111-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1665km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 59min vs 2h 34min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~265 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons