In our Lisbon to Madrid EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 627km route in 6h 33min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 33min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~100 kWh
- Distance: 627km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 43min |
6h 33min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
35min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~113 kWh |
~112 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
FUEL 10 (20 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hostal Restaurant Portugal II (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Polígono Sector 3 (12 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Lisbon (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aparcamiento Area Servicio Abades Mérida (20 min, 12% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Hostal La Plata (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 627km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~100 kWh vs ~106 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons