In our Madrid to Barcelona EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 10 minutes, completing the 620km route in 6h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 52min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~99 kWh
- Distance: 620km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 2min |
6h 52min |
| Charging time: |
55min |
46min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~112 kWh |
~111 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Restaurante Cafeteria Valdeherrera, Calatayud (10 min, 26% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Calle Gaspar Torrente, Saragossa (19 min, 20% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Pavelló Municipal, l'Albi (26 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Barcelona
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice, La Almunia de Doña Godina (25 min, 19% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Pavelló Municipal, l'Albi (21 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Barcelona
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 10-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 620km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 55min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~99 kWh vs ~105 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons