In our Madrid to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 2358km route in 24h 50min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 50min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~385 kWh
- Distance: 2358km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 50min |
25h 7min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~424 kWh |
~425 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Aire de Bages (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire De Livron (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Backstage Pub (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Süd (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (11 min, 45% → 76%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aire de Bages (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Tricastin (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Aire de Mouxy (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Migrol Westside (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Süd (11 min, 19% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Esso Tankstelle Einsteinstraße (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
JET Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2358km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~385 kWh vs ~433 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons