In our Madrid to Warsaw EV duel, the Citroën ë-C4 beats the Citroën ë-Berlingo by 22 minutes, completing the 2855km route in 32h 54min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Citroën ë-C4 needs only 26 charging stops compared to 28 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Citroën ë-C4
- Total time: 32h 54min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 26
- Charging time: 6h 13min
- Energy: ~486 kWh
- Distance: 2855km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Citroën ë-Berlingo |
Citroën ë-C4 |
| Travel time |
33h 16min |
32h 54min |
| Charging time: |
6h 31min |
6h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
28 |
26 |
| Energy used |
~514 kWh |
~514 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Citroën ë-Berlingo Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Carburantes (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Briviesca Sur (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
Bar Restaurante Lermanda (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Lidl (10 min, 14% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger McDonald's (18 min, 11% → 63%)
-
Stop 7:
Intermarché (13 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aire de Bédenac Est (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger N10 (25 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Warsemann Automobiles (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Aire de Val Neuvy (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 13:
Lidl (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 14:
Aire de Ressons Est (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 15:
Carrefour Valenciennes (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 16:
Supercharger ibis Styles (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 17:
IONITY Shell Eupen (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 18:
McDonald's Bandwirkerstraße (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 19:
Vellern Süd (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 20:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 21:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 22:
Supercharger Irxleben (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 23:
NORMA (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 24:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 25:
MOP Koryta (17 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 26:
MOP Konarzewo (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 27:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 28:
IONITY Niesułków (14 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Citroën ë-C4 Route
- Start: Madrid (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Calle Herreros (14 min, 16% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
Bar Restaurante Lermanda (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Telleria Industrialdea (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger McDonald's (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Intermarché (11 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Aire de Bédenac Est (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger N10 (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Aire de Service de Fontaine Colette (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 9:
Warsemann Automobiles (13 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Val Neuvy (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 11:
Lidl (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de Ressons Est (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 13:
Carrefour Valenciennes (14 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 14:
Supercharger ibis Styles (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 15:
IONITY Shell Eupen (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 16:
Supercharger KFC (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 17:
Vellern Süd (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 18:
Fastned Rastplatz Fuchsgrund Süd (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 19:
IONITY Lehrter See Süd (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 20:
Supercharger Irxleben (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 21:
NORMA (13 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 22:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 23:
MOP Koryta (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 24:
MOP Konarzewo (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 25:
Orlen MOP Osiecza III (17 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 26:
IONITY Niesułków (14 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Citroën ë-C4 Won
The Citroën ë-C4 achieved a 22-minute advantage over Citroën ë-Berlingo on this 2855km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 26 stops vs 28 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 6h 13min vs 6h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~486 kWh vs ~576 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons