In our Oslo to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 70 minutes, completing the 1344km route in 15h 26min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 26min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1344km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 26min |
16h 36min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
1h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~242 kWh |
~238 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Rewe (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Groß Mackenstedt (13 min, 11% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Recharge De Hackelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (15 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Q8 Motelvej (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Erhvervspark (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Ostetal Nord (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Jaeger-Tank & Rasthof Lastrup Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Haerst (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1344km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~212 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons