In our Amsterdam to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 74 minutes, completing the 1343km route in 15h 30min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 30min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~209 kWh
- Distance: 1343km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
15h 30min |
16h 44min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~242 kWh |
~237 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
BP Kriterion IJburglaan (11 min, 98% → 100%)
-
Stop 2:
Decathlon (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Farø (14 min, 25% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Amsterdam (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Telekom Emsteker Straße (16 min, 20% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
bft Willer (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Burger King (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Circle K Kongevejen (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Importgatan (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Svinesundparken (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1343km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 1h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~209 kWh vs ~212 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons