In our Oslo to Amsterdam EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 18 minutes, completing the 1324km route in 16h 38min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 16h 38min (18 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 40min
- Energy: ~211 kWh
- Distance: 1324km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 56min |
16h 38min |
| Charging time: |
2h 0min |
1h 40min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~238 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Vikingagrillen (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Nordhøj (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Clever Burger King (10 min, 19% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
bft Willer (12 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Selgros Öjendorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Daisy's Diner (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 9:
Jaeger-Tank & Rasthof Lastrup Nord (17 min, 11% → 56%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Haerst (12 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Oslo (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Importgatan (16 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Q8 Motelvej (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Erhvervspark (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
JET Tankstelle Krempelsdorfer Allee (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Ostetal Nord (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Jaeger-Tank & Rasthof Lastrup Nord (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell Haerst (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 18-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1324km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 40min vs 2h 0min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~211 kWh vs ~224 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons